American Water Resources Lawsuit

Are you aware of the fact that the lawsuit against American Water Resources (AWR) began when Brooklyn homeowner Joseph Rabinowitz felt let down by the company? Like, back in the year 2013, Rabinowitz purchased a water and sewer line protection plan from AWR, regularly paying his premiums, you know? But it was actually in February 2018, when a leak in his sewer line was detected, he found the promised coverage wasn’t as reliable as he had thought. Sure enough, then, with the anticipation of help, Rabinowitz approached AWR, hoping they would repair the sewer line.

AWR totally dismissed the damage claim, even after a private plumber showed that the exterior sewer line that the plan covered was in bad shape and was cracked. AWR eventually would not accept the observation and blamed the plumber for the damage. Rabinowitz’s hope and solace turned into frustration, and he felt that he had been cheated on, so he sought legal action, which we now know as this American Water Resources Lawsuit. So, let’s just go over the details of it all, shall we?

Why And How Did The Case Move Forward?

Well, you see, back in June 2018, Rabinowitz filed a lawsuit against AWR in New Jersey and accused them of breaching the company contract period, you know? In this case, though, AWR attempted to dismiss the case, but Judge Noel L. Hillman allowed further recourse, asserting that Rabinowitz had valid claims. The judge went on to say that the lawsuit wasn’t about its outcome at this time, rather it was simply a matter of Rabinowitz’s right to justice that was due for attention.

Moreover, the court turned down AWR’s efforts to strike certain portions of the complaint, you know? Like, these included claims that AWR did not refer to their “insurance” protection plans to escape legal requirements. Sure enough, as we saw, Judge Hillman said that these accusations must be valid and are correct decisions so, Rabinowitz will have the right, and possibly the other affected customers will be able to have their cases taken to court.

What’s The Core Issues In All This?

To be honest, this case is really about two important principles: trust and fairness. Like, Rabinowitz states he has done everything asked of him, paying premiums and observing the agreement, only to discover that AWR then failed him when required. Therefore he accuses AWR of defaulting and acting in bad faith and insists they have also acted similarly to fellow customers, which is not just unfair but it is illegal as well.

It just doesn’t end there though, another major accusation is related to AWR’s marketing practices. Rabinowitz is saying that the company was presenting their plan as a certain trust for homeowners, but at the same time, they had no intention whatsoever of supporting some repair types. Sure enough, such blame points that AWR might have deceived customers into buying extra services that really did not help them, so yes, it falls under the category of shady practices.

Who’s Involved?

If you have been following this case, you’ll know that the findings involve attorney Stephen J. Fearon Jr. by the side of Rabinowitz, you know? Like, AWR is committed to suing the affected homeowners through him. Sure enough, Fearon asserted that AWR regularly neglected its commitments, and customers like Rabinowitz were left high and dry. AWR, on the other hand, has rarely responded to the judge’s ruling that the case may proceed down the line.

Why This Case Matters

Sure enough, this lawsuit, however, does not just impact Rabinowitz alone. This just is another case for customers who put their faith in service contracts or protection offers. Always keep in mind that businesses such as AWR that refuse to uphold their loyalty may put in jeopardy the consumer’s rights and corporate responsibility because it is impossible to get away from the law if a business is doing something shady and cheating on its customers.