Are you aware of the fact that Hask shampoo, a super popular hair care brand right here in the United States, is actually in kinda a legal mess for using cocamide DEA as one of the ingredients? Well, as per the allegations, that’s what is wrong with their shampoo and it is quite concerning for the customers who regularly use it. Sure enough, the California Proposition 65 has summoned this substance as a probable carcinogen and thereby Hask has come under suspicion, but how did it go down?
Well, just so you know, the issue kinda took off back in the month of November 2021 when a notice was sent by a law firm on behalf of a woman named Precila Balabbo. So, let’s just go over the details of what is going on with the Hask Shampoo Lawsuit, and if you really use this shampoo, why should you be concerned at all? Here we go.
What is Proposition 65?
If you don’t know anything about what this Proposition 65 thing is, then you shouldn’t be skipping over this one. Why? Well, just so you know, the law known as Proposition 65 was made in California. And yes, it is a law meant to assist people in shielding themselves from harmful substances that live in everyday products. Like, it adheres to directives of plain and organized labeling of those products. Companies remove the names of those found to be hazardous to the health of the consumers from their labels. In this case, though, the name of the substance that they have used that can cause cancer is cocamide DEA. According to the complaint, Hask has no immunity mode for alloying the cocamide DEA in their shampoos causing consumers to misjudge the things they purchase based on a considerable amount of false knowledge, and that’s what people are complaining about, and that’s precisely why there is this lawsuit in action.
What Really Are The Allegations Against Hask?
Sure enough, you can say so that Hask is blamed head-on for the situation that led to the customers using cocamide DEA-containing shampoos without a warning. And yes, this is a chemical that is capable of being absorbed through the skin or in case it comes in contact with hands and is ingested by accident, it could enter the body. All in all, the lawsuit states that the daily use of shampoo can happen repeatedly over a long time and expose the user to health risks which are thus considerably enhanced, that’s kinda the main focus here.
Possible Consequences for Hask
As you could have suspected a big company would do such a thing when they get into some legal trouble, well, Hask kinda did the same. Why’s that though? Well, just so you know, Hask received two months to address the claims, such as recalling the affected products, adding appropriate warning labels, or reformulating their shampoos to exclude the cocamide DEA, you know? But, keep in mind, if no action is taken, they could face legal penalties, or the company may have to pay damages, or even come to a halt or cease sales until corrections are put in place. Sure enough, given the nationwide availability of Hask products, this lawsuit’s outcome could affect countless customers across the country.
Hask’s Response So Far
Again, yes, so far, Hask has not made a public statement addressing the allegations. You see, the company has neither admitted fault nor indicated whether it will recall products or alter formulations. This silence is concerning and uncertain for customers while public pressure on the brand is still building, and this case gets even messier down the line, both for the customers as well as for the company itself. So, if you really are a customer of this brand, we’d suggest you keep up with this case because you literally are using their shampoo that can cause hair fall and severe health concerns.